Is HibernateD dead?

[bauss]

On Thursday, 3 May 2018 at 18:01:07 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> DiamondMVC looks nice, but I would need PostgreSQL support for 
> sure.
> Therefore, I think there are three options:
>  1) Extend the DiamondMVC ORM to support missing features that 
> Hibernated has (maybe make it use ddbc as backend?)
>  2) Revive Hibernated - contacting Vadim Lopatin would be key 
> for that, and maybe the project could be maintained in the 
> dlang-community organization (although there are competing 
> projects for it...)
>  3) Find a different D ORM that does the job and expand it to 
> include missing features.

Yes, I completely agree with PostgreSQL support. It's really 
important to me getting that working, as well MSSQL. I was hoping 
I could find time this weekend to actually do that.

Perhaps I will end up having another "optional" dependency to it 
as a temporary until I can have a better implementation or 
something.

The frontend part of postgresql is almost finished, it's just 
having the postgresql driver working properly, which is where 
it's frozen right now.

MSSQL should be fairly easy, just wrapping odbc, which perhaps I 
could make a general odbc orm wrapper which could then be used 
for pretty much all alternatives.