Error running concurrent process and storing results in array

[drug]

07.05.2020 17:49, data pulverizer пишет:
> On Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 02:06:32 UTC, data pulverizer wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 6 May 2020 at 10:23:17 UTC, data pulverizer wrote:
>>> D:      ~ 1.5 seconds
>>
>> This is going to sound absurd but can we do even better? If none of 
>> the optimizations we have so far is using simd maybe we can get even 
>> better performance by using it. I think I need to go and read a simd 
>> primer.
> 
> After running the Julia code by the Julia community they made some 
> changes (using views rather than passing copies of the array) and their 
> time has come down to ~ 2.5 seconds. The plot thickens.

That's a good sign because I was afraid that super short D time was a 
result of wrong benchmark (too good to be truth). I'm glad D time really 
is both great and real. Your blog post definitely will be very interesting.