Error running concurrent process and storing results in array
data pulverizer
data.pulverizer at gmail.com
Thu May 7 16:30:03 UTC 2020
On Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 15:41:12 UTC, drug wrote:
> 07.05.2020 17:49, data pulverizer пишет:
>> On Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 02:06:32 UTC, data pulverizer wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 6 May 2020 at 10:23:17 UTC, data pulverizer
>>> wrote:
>>>> D: ~ 1.5 seconds
>>
>> After running the Julia code by the Julia community they made
>> some changes (using views rather than passing copies of the
>> array) and their time has come down to ~ 2.5 seconds. The plot
>> thickens.
>
> That's a good sign because I was afraid that super short D time
> was a result of wrong benchmark (too good to be truth). I'm
> glad D time really is both great and real. Your blog post
> definitely will be very interesting.
Don't worry, the full code will be released so that it can be
inspected by anyone interested before the blog is released. Now
working for a version on Nim for even more comparison. Can't wait
to find out how everything compares.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list