Error running concurrent process and storing results in array

data pulverizer data.pulverizer at gmail.com
Thu May 7 16:30:03 UTC 2020


On Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 15:41:12 UTC, drug wrote:
> 07.05.2020 17:49, data pulverizer пишет:
>> On Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 02:06:32 UTC, data pulverizer wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 6 May 2020 at 10:23:17 UTC, data pulverizer 
>>> wrote:
>>>> D:      ~ 1.5 seconds
>> 
>> After running the Julia code by the Julia community they made 
>> some changes (using views rather than passing copies of the 
>> array) and their time has come down to ~ 2.5 seconds. The plot 
>> thickens.
>
> That's a good sign because I was afraid that super short D time 
> was a result of wrong benchmark (too good to be truth). I'm 
> glad D time really is both great and real. Your blog post 
> definitely will be very interesting.

Don't worry, the full code will be released so that it can be 
inspected by anyone interested before the blog is released. Now 
working for a version on Nim for even more comparison. Can't wait 
to find out how everything compares.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list