Escape this in pure members
anonymous at example.com
Wed Sep 23 14:58:22 UTC 2020
On 23.09.20 02:06, DlangUser38 wrote:
> The following analysis might be wrong but I think that `scope` as a
> **member** function attribute is not supposed to be used as that is not
> even documented.
It's documented here:
Quote: "[`scope` and `return`] may appear after the formal parameter
list, in which case they apply either to a method's this parameter, or
[... irrelevant ...]."
It's less than ideal that the documentation of `scope` is spread over
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn