C++ or D?

[RSY]

On Thursday, 31 December 2020 at 19:57:53 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
Grøstad wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 December 2020 at 19:27:23 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe 
> wrote:
>> On Thursday, 31 December 2020 at 16:03:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
>> Grøstad wrote:
>>> What would you like to see?
>>
>> For shared to mean something.
>> Stackless coroutines.
>> Compile-time lifetime management, i.e. better ways to define 
>> ownership.
>
> I second that. At least some way to know whether a pointer 
> takes ownership (GC/RC) or just is an auxiliary reference.

i agree with this, C++ has GC, smart pointer and even some 
facilities for ownership via various move semantic

that is an area where D could improve, but that would be catch up 
with C++..

one big move would be to finally put the allocators out of 
std.experimental, and finally embrace this everywhere (just like 
ziglang)