Using a betterC dub package in ordinary D

Arjan arjan at ask.me.to
Fri Jan 8 21:52:06 UTC 2021


On Friday, 8 January 2021 at 20:19:59 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
>
> Off topick, the original js implementation is documented to not 
> generate results that are guaranteed to be correct. I could not 
> find information on what the conditions are that cause 
> deviations, and how large these then can be. Do you have an 
> idea about this or experience with accuracy of the algorithm? I 
> am looking into whether earcutd can replace GLU tesselation. We 
> use the result for engineering purposes (not only 
> visualisation) and correctness is important to us.

I've used documentation and implementations from David Eberly at 
https://www.geometrictools.com/ and also on github nowadays to 
get 'correct' or at least 'predictable' behavior for various 
geometric challenges.

Using this library solved various issues for us. The 
documentation is great!


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list