Parameters declared as the alias of a template won't accept the arguments of the same type.
Loara
loara at noreply.com
Mon May 2 16:29:05 UTC 2022
On Sunday, 1 May 2022 at 03:57:12 UTC, Elfstone wrote:
> module test;
>
> struct MatrixImpl(S, size_t M, size_t N)
> {
> }
>
> template Vector(S, size_t N)
> {
> alias Vector = MatrixImpl!(S, 1, N);
> }
>
> @nogc
> S dot1(S, size_t N)(in Vector!(S, N) lhs, in Vector!(S, N)
> rhs)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> @nogc
> S dot2(S, size_t N)(in MatrixImpl!(S, 1, N) lhs, in
> MatrixImpl!(S, 1, N) rhs)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> unittest
> {
> import std.stdio;
>
> Vector!(float, 2) a, b;
> dot1(a, b); // Error: none of the overloads of template
> `test.dot1` are callable using argument types
> `!()(MatrixImpl!(float, 1LU, 2LU), MatrixImpl!(float, 1LU,
> 2LU))`
> // Candidate is: `dot1(S, ulong N)(in
> Vector!(S, N) lhs, in Vector!(S, N) rhs)`
> dot2(a, b); // compiles
> static if (is(Vector!(float, 2) == MatrixImpl!(float,
> 1, 2)))
> {
> writeln("WTH"); // prints
> }
> }
>
> It's natural to declare it the way dot1 is declared, isn't it?
> Is this a bug?
> Or I simply can't assume alias works the way I thought it would.
> Can I work around it, without falling back to the abominable
> dot2?
Template deduction for aliased function parameter is a very
tricky argument and it's not so simple to handle in certain
cases. Consider for example this code:
```d
template MyAlias(T){
alias MyAlias = int;
}
T simp(T)(MyAlias!T val){
return T.init;
}
int main(){
simp(3);//Impossible to deduce T
simp( cast(MyAlias!string) 4);//Also invalid since
MyAlias!string is exactly int
simp!string(4);//Ok, no parameter deduction
}
```
Instead to use aliases it's better (both in D and in C++) to use
constraints/concepts.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list