Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
ProtectAndHide
ProtectAndHide at gmail.com
Tue Feb 14 10:16:47 UTC 2023
On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 08:15:37 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> My point is you know you're just picky.
Well.. it seems to me, that your 'point' is to just have a go at
me.
In any case, there is nothing 'picky' about wanting to be able to
explicately 'declare' a member of my class type as being private.
That to me, is what a programmer should expect to be able to do
in a language that says it supports OOP.
Further nonsense towards me will be ignored ;-)
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list