Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

ProtectAndHide ProtectAndHide at
Tue Feb 14 10:16:47 UTC 2023

On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 08:15:37 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> My point is you know you're just picky.

Well.. it seems to me, that your 'point' is to just have a go at 

In any case, there is nothing 'picky' about wanting to be able to 
explicately 'declare' a member of my class type as being private. 
That to me, is what a programmer should expect to be able to do 
in a language that says it supports OOP.

Further nonsense towards me will be ignored ;-)

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list