Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

[bachmeier]

On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 07:13:41 UTC, thebluepandabear 
wrote:
>> Time to move on to OCaml programmers telling us D doesn't have 
>> floating point arithmetic because there's no `+.` operator.
>
> that's not the same thing though, you've created a great false 
> equivalence! Congrats.

Only if you don't understand D's encapsulation. You're going on 
at length (apparently under multiple names in this thread) 
because you don't like D's implementation of encapsulation. 
That's no different from complaining that the `+` operator should 
be `+.`, and until D makes the change, it doesn't support 
floating point addition.

There are reasonable arguments for changing and not changing D's 
implementation of encapsulation. Your claim that D doesn't 
support encapsulation is false.