Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
thereabluepandabear at protonmail.com
Wed Feb 15 20:34:13 UTC 2023
On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 20:06:18 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 07:13:41 UTC,
> thebluepandabear wrote:
>>> Time to move on to OCaml programmers telling us D doesn't
>>> have floating point arithmetic because there's no `+.`
>> that's not the same thing though, you've created a great false
>> equivalence! Congrats.
> Only if you don't understand D's encapsulation. You're going on
> at length (apparently under multiple names in this thread)
> because you don't like D's implementation of encapsulation.
> That's no different from complaining that the `+` operator
> should be `+.`, and until D makes the change, it doesn't
> support floating point addition.
> There are reasonable arguments for changing and not changing
> D's implementation of encapsulation. Your claim that D doesn't
> support encapsulation is false.
'under multiple names'... You can clearly see I have the same
name, simply different profile pictures.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn