Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
ProtectAndHide at gmail.com
Sat Feb 18 06:55:49 UTC 2023
On Saturday, 18 February 2023 at 06:12:47 UTC, RTM wrote:
> No offense, but it looks like your surprise comes from your
More likely is comes from my experience .. otherwise I wouldn't
be surprised ;-)
I love the way that Brayan Martinez (Senior Developer with Azure,
Spring Boot, and Flutter.) outlines all the well-thoughout out
Then the next guy says..."Sounds like personal preference."
As for me, I don't even know what Dart is ;-)
I guess we could all revert to:
int _x; // this is private. please don't use it outside of this
and hope that people read and comply with that instruction -
cause we all know how great people are at following instructions
D could just add a new keyword (problem solved!)
intern int x; // x is internal to foo.
of course, then we get to the next issue ... protected ;-)
No, I think D is not for me.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn