Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

[Salih Dincer]

On Saturday, 28 January 2023 at 23:19:35 UTC, ProtectAndHide 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 January 2023 at 15:43:46 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
>>
>> using static class and static function is not "OOP way" of 
>> doing things, it's a hack to mimic procedural style because 
>> Java doesn't have proper modules / scoping
>>
>> mimicking the shortcomings of Java is a bad idea imo
>>
>> D empowers you to write simple yet effective code, you should 
>> give it a try and embrace it
>
> Classes (and this includes static classes) are 'one' means of 
> encapsulation.

I hate a world with the classes. I can do almost anything I want 
without the classes. The software world soared above C without 
classes.

SDB at 79