Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

RTM riven at baryonides.ru
Mon Jan 30 06:09:56 UTC 2023

Previous message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Next message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Saturday, 28 January 2023 at 23:19:35 UTC, ProtectAndHide 
wrote:

> That is, you can do OOP without classes

How so? Every OOP definition includes classes (encapsulation + 
inheritance).

Previous message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Next message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list