D vs Java

Anders F Björklund afb at algonet.se
Sun Mar 19 06:06:04 PST 2006


BLS wrote:

> I do not mean that you will let wxD die. I mean the wxNet project is quit
> dead. So the problem I am talking about is  the fact that wxD depends on
> wxc.

It's actually not really a problem, just means "more work for us".

The last two or three wxD versions have added features that are not 
available (yet?) in wx.NET, and we're moving towards wx 2.6.3 now...

The "wxc" that we use is specific to wxD now, just as our "wxd" is
a ported version of the wx.NET classes. So it's a clean fork anyway ?

It's all good.

We don't *need* the wx.NET project, even if it's sad to see it go...
(guess most people are using GTK# instead, since it's recommended ?)

Do of course need the main wxWidgets project, but that's a good thing 
since it is very active and since we can use the same wx libraries ?

--anders

PS.
I'm trying to fix some more of the wxD crashing bugs / memory leaks,
but we could always use some more testing and feedback, I suppose...

Tracker is at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=133831



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list