Proposal for a standard for D library naming

[Lars Ivar Igesund]

Bruno Medeiros wrote:

> Gregor Richards wrote:
>>         o The only rule is that any module must be in the most
>> specifically-named library corresponding to that module. That is, if you
>> have libD.a.b.so.0 and libD.a.so.0, the module a.b.c should be in
>> libD.a.b.so.0, not libD.a.so.0. Doing otherwise is fairly ridiculous
>> anyway.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Why so? Why should a given library be splited across multiple so/dll
> files according to package, instead of being compiled in just one file?
> 
> 

You totally missed the point, if the library _is_ split, then there should
be a standardized way to decide which part a module is in.

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource & #D: larsivi