Comparison chart worries

[Jeff]

>> (...) Several other 
>> features you claim are "important" are really not (like multiple 
>> inheritance, which is dangerous to begin with).

Huh? Don't the D docs -support- this stance?

Other than that, I have to agree that the comparison chart seems to me 
to be a bit zealous, and could do more harm than good in its current state.

Maybe instead of just having big shiny green "Yes" and "No" labels 
(supported occasionally by footnotes) the table could be modified to 
note in-line

- which features are provided by the language;
- which are provided by the standard library; and
- which are absent from both (regardless of whether they're implemented 
in other popular libraries because, well, with enough hacks you can 
implement almost anything in some external library, and that doesn't 
necessarily make it useful or usable! :P).

Perhaps a green "Yes (core)", an amber "Yes (std library)" and a red "No"?

Might I suggest #FF77FF, #FFBB77 and #FF7777 to give our eyes a rest? ;)