Phobos licensing

[Pragma]

Frits van Bommel wrote:
> Pragma wrote:
>> Ant wrote:
>>> I just downloaded dmd 1.015.
>>> still contains that license.
>>>
>>> :(
>>>
>>> Ant
>>
>> Not to sound callous, but perhaps it's time the community wrote a more 
>> open version of this?  Last I looked at std.loader, it was merely a 
>> facade for LoadLibrary/dlopen (and related functions).
> 
> Why would it be time for that, since the original author has given 
> permission to distribute the current version under a BSD-style license 
> (as noted elsewhere in this thread) and the only thing left to do is to 
> actually change the license text in the source files?

Sorry, I missed that post - I wasn't aware of that fact.  In that case, yea, the license really needs to go.

-- 
- EricAnderton at yahoo