Publicity (was: Re: Why is 2.0 in the works already?)

[Anders Bergh]

On 6/19/07, Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar at igesund.net> wrote:
> The only reason to worry about TIOBE, is that high rankings may boost
> knowledge about D. As is rather obvious by looking at the list, D's numbers
> are most likely highly inflated, and a reason for this is suggested at
>
> http://cdsmith.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/is-tiobe-fatally-flawed/

I just read that post, and scrolling down to the comments makes the
post less notable. Google apparently cuts results at 1000 results, and
removes duplicates, shrinking the numbers which caused his search
results to be even more flawed than TIOBE's.

-- 
Anders