Suggestion (ping Walter): Improve unit testing.

[Bill Baxter]

Greg Weber wrote:
> Gregor Richards Wrote:
> 
>> I hate to do this, but ... BUMP!
>>
>> It's been three weeks since I posted this, and nobody in any kind of 
>> position of authority (*cough* Walter) has responded ... a lot of people 
>> have said this would be nifty, and yet it continues to be ignored.
>>
>> Can I at least get a "no, I don't agree"? I hate the halting problem :-(
>>
>>   - Gregor Richards
> 
> I am new to D and have been using it a lot over the last month.  One of the things that is nice about D is how things seem to 'make sense'.  Unit testing requiring the program to be run was completely unexpected.  I think that the unit testing in the source code feature is one of the best things about D, but also probably the feature that is lacking most for a better implementation.
> 
> Greg Weber

I agree too.  I was baffled when I first started getting linker errors 
trying to run unittests on some source code that lacked a main().

--bb