Janice Caron schrieb: > So, we can write p.m for real pointers, but we have to write (*p).m > for classes that implement opStar()? That seems inconsistent. > > What's opStar for, if not to implement iterators? i think the same way as in c++ - for example vector class with multiplication operator do not missunderstand the syntax "*e" wrong a * b --> *b == *e