toString vs. toUtf8

[Lars Ivar Igesund]

Kris wrote:

> "Sean Kelly" <sean at f4.ca> wrote in message
> [snip]
>>> Don't know if that hurts your eyes less or not, but it seems more
>>> consistent with Tango's existing naming convention to me than toWString,
>>> etc.
>>
>> Yeah I was thinking the same thing.  It's certainly easier for me to read
>> than the other form.
> 
> 
> Bill: actually, toString, toStringW and toStringD are more consistent with
> themselves, and with Tango convention. Even toString, toString16 and
> toString32 are significantly more style-consistent than toWString and
> toWstring

FWIW, this would be preferable to me too.

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango