Poll: are you using D2.0?

[Bruce Adams]

Tomas Lindquist Olsen Wrote:

> Bruce Adams wrote:
> > Tomas Lindquist Olsen Wrote:
> > 
> >> Nope. I wish there was no D 2.0.
> > 
> > Isn't that a little like wishing there was no tomorrow? A language, especially one as new as D must have some room to mature.
> 
> I guess you could see it like that. I don't like what I'm seeing D2.0 
> become and thus I wish it didn't exist. Probably when D1.0 is no longer 
> maintained I wont be using D anymore... At least that is how I feel 
> about the whole thing right now. Who knows, maybe D-const will actually 
> turn out quite nice, and I might change my mind.

What has D2.0 become? I just see a better D myself. Apart from the const mess, do you see anything else with a bad smell? I guess D1.0 was a pure C++ refactoring while D2.0 is trying to move beyond that and make D something more in its own right?