const as per popular demand

[Carlos Santander]

Brad Roberts escribió:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Carlos Santander wrote:
> 
>> First, let me say that I haven't finished reading all those const posts. 
>> I still have 129 to go.
>>
>> What made me remember this was a post by Steven Schveighoffer where he asked
>> "what's wrong with mutable?"
>>
>> Three months ago there was a poll here:
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=54361
>> Mostly everyone agreed to be willing to at least try const by default. If we
>> all are in the trying-stuff bandwagon, why can't we try that and just see what
>> happens?
>>
>> I'll go back now to try to catch up. TGIF!
>>
>> -- 
>> Carlos Santander Bernal
> 
> The debate about the default state is irrelevant until the meaning of the 
> state is actually agreed upon, or atleast an implementation is set that is 
> likely to stick around.  In other words, default to what sort of const?
> 

Sigh, guess you're right...

> Now, back to the regularly scheduled lack of agreements on what sorts of 
> constantness should exist.
> 
> Later,
> Brad


-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal