Why so many theoretical discussions when ...

[Vincent Richomme]

superdan a écrit :
> Vincent Richomme Wrote:
> 
> this is rich. no pun intended. i've seen my share of pearls on the usenet. but this one deserves to be framed and hanged by my desk.
> 
he's not contributing any code bug reports or even posts.
My contribution : a D compiler for Windows CE/Pocket PC
http://www.smartmobili.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=38&Itemid=41

his grand total of posts is six.
Now it's 7


but in fairness they include this chef d'oeuvre. but mind you he is 
watching!
guess we gotta be grateful for that.
so grateful that we should change preference on the subjects we choose 
to discuss.
we now have to chat about packages and stuff whether or not we know or 
care about'em.
then make proposals. then have walt implement them pronto.
that way monsieur leech can continue enjoying using the language and 
reading the newsgroup.
of course posting on the subject of packages would be too much effort 
for monsieur leech.
he'd rather just watch.
> 
> but wait, monsieur leech has even more good advice. 
> he don't see any changes in the dmd compiler. sorry walt. 
> your best ain't good enuff for monsieur leech. 
> guess the monthly releases, 
> wads of bugfixes with each of'em and the neckbreaking evolution of d2 don't count.
Sorry but actually I am watching GDC compiler and I don't know enough 
about dmd.

> 
> now if you'll excuse me. i have to prepare a post on the subpackage access subject.
Please don't lose your time with monsieur leech ;-)