Why so many theoretical discussions when ...

[superdan]

Vincent Richomme Wrote:

> superdan a écrit :
> > Vincent Richomme Wrote:
> > 
> > this is rich. no pun intended. i've seen my share of pearls on the usenet. but this one deserves to be framed and hanged by my desk.
> > 
> he's not contributing any code bug reports or even posts.
> My contribution : a D compiler for Windows CE/Pocket PC
> http://www.smartmobili.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=38&Itemid=41

now yer talkin'. i could even understand it tho mon francais est pire.

> his grand total of posts is six.
> Now it's 7
> 
> 
> but in fairness they include this chef d'oeuvre. but mind you he is 
> watching!
> guess we gotta be grateful for that.
> so grateful that we should change preference on the subjects we choose 
> to discuss.
> we now have to chat about packages and stuff whether or not we know or 
> care about'em.
> then make proposals. then have walt implement them pronto.
> that way monsieur leech can continue enjoying using the language and 
> reading the newsgroup.
> of course posting on the subject of packages would be too much effort 
> for monsieur leech.
> he'd rather just watch.
> > 
> > but wait, monsieur leech has even more good advice. 
> > he don't see any changes in the dmd compiler. sorry walt. 
> > your best ain't good enuff for monsieur leech. 
> > guess the monthly releases, 
> > wads of bugfixes with each of'em and the neckbreaking evolution of d2 don't count.
> Sorry but actually I am watching GDC compiler and I don't know enough 
> about dmd.

simple guideline. dunno, dun talk. same applies to knowledge of stl eh.

> > now if you'll excuse me. i have to prepare a post on the subpackage access subject.
> Please don't lose your time with monsieur leech ;-)

glad we got each other's point. thanks for writin'.