Standard Library Concerns (Phobos / Tango)

[Ameer Armaly]

"Walter Bright" <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote in message 
news:foh36t$2519$1 at digitalmars.com...
> There are currently several people working on Phobos, so it is far from 
> abandoned. For example, last November saw a raft of major additions to it.
>
> What I see as the goal for Phobos/Tango is for there to be a compatible 
> core, so that users can mix/match what they need from either library.
Could you possibly elaborate on this point? Do you mean for Tango to become 
an extension lib like I proposed earlier,  for there to be some sort of 
shared codebase from which the two branch, or possibly sommething totally 
different I have yet to think about?