My Kingdom For ...

[Moritz Warning]

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:24:11 -0800, Robert Fraser wrote:

> Moritz Warning wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:53:00 -0700, Darryl Bleau wrote:
>> 
>>> bearophile wrote:
>>>> Another solution is to think "in" as an operator, and "!in" as two
>>>> operators, where ! negates the result of the precedent "in", where
>>>> "in" returns a pointer. I don't see this as silly :-)
>>> I should have read this first. Yes, that's exactly what I would like.
>> 
>> Fwiw:
>> "is" may be no boolean operator, but "!" is a boolean operator. Hence,
>> "!is" can be boolean operator the same way as "=" is not a boolean
>> operator, but "!=" is.
> 
> Did you man "in"? "is" is a boolean operator.

Yes, I meant "in", not "is". - memory corruption. ;)

"=" is no boolean operator, but "!=" is.
The reason for not having "!in" is weak, imho.