D learning curve
Sascha Katzner
sorry.no at spam.invalid
Sun Jun 15 02:38:47 PDT 2008
Robert Fraser wrote:
> The GC/runtime/IO is faster & less buggy than Phobos's in general, so
> for production code (or code you want to be blazing fast), Tango is th
> better choice.
If you want "blazing fast" code, it is mostly the better choice to use
customized code. Libraries tend to be over protective (for a good
reason) and therefore sometimes wasting a lot of time with unnecessary
stuff like error checking for errors that could never occur in a
specific situation. Tasks like memory management and IO are very good
examples for this.
When I'm using a library I don't expect to get the fastest code, but
_reliable_ code that I don't have to write on my own. Your observation
that Phobos seems to have more bugs _could_be_ a direct consequence of
that it is used by more people... SCNR ;)
LLAP,
Sascha
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list