C++, D: Dinosaurs?

[Christopher Wright]

Tony wrote:
> I can't disclose those details, sorry.

Either you're working for DoD, or you're trolling. If the entire point 
of your code were memory management, you would have said that, most 
likely, and would have no interest in D, unless you could base its 
garbage collector on your memory management system.

I can't fathom your purpose in posting here. You ask us for what D does 
better than C++ and immediately say that none of it applies to you, and 
imply that it's not worthwhile. D isn't the language for you. You've 
established that. Why are you still here?