property / getProperty() / setProperty()

[Ary Borenszweig]

Andrei Alexandrescu escribió:
> bearophile wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu:
>>> Thanks. So it looks like get_property() and set_property() could fly. 
>>> How does that sound?
>>
>> Not too much good. Among the simpler solutions there's the 'property' 
>> attribute, that while not helping in reducing code (it makes code 
>> longer!) solves most problems, while being simple. It's the minimal 
>> solution that I think will work/fly.
> 
> We can't throw keywords at problems like they're getting out of style. 

Hey! Let's introduce pure functions --> the new "pure" keyword was added.

Hey! Let's introduce functions that don't throw --> the new "nothrow" 
keyword was added.

Hey! Let's introduce thread local storage --> "shared" and "__gshared" 
keyword added.

Hey! Let's introduce... annotations and stop adding keywords for every 
new feature.