The future of D 1.x

[Lutger]

Dominik wrote:
...
> thanks for reply - what attracted me to D was D1/Tango combination and I
> think I wouldn't use D without Tango at all - I have no idea what Phobos2
> brings to the table in practice yet, but from what I can see it does not
> look like a suitable replacement.

Though they overlap, phobos and tango do have different scopes and somewhat 
different programming styles. 

Would you consider using D2 if Tango was available for it?