yank '>>>'?

[Walter Bright]

dsimcha wrote:
> == Quote from KennyTM~ (kennytm at gmail.com)'s article
>> No, it will _silently_ break code that uses >>> as unsigned right shift.
> 
> Well, we could get around this by making >>> an error for a few releases, and then
> only after everyone's removed their >>>s that mean unsigned shift, we could drop
> in the rotate semantics.

It'll still silently break code moving from D1 to D2.