Source control for all dmd source (Git propaganda =)

["Jérôme M. Berger"]

Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Anyways, my point was, putting DMDFE in a SCM would be great, even when
> it's svn. For me the ideal would be Git, Mercurial or other distributed
> SCM would be nice, but even svn is better than we have now =)
> 
	Oh, I agree. However, IMO git is a poor choice. Mercurial, Bazaar 
or svn would be better.

	For some interesting reading:

- Here are the reasons that pushed Python to use Mercurial (includes 
the reasons for the change from centralized to distributed SCM and 
the reasons for choosing Mercurial): 
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0374/

- Here's the same for Mozilla: 
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/preed/2007/04/version_control_system_shootou_1.html

		Jerome
-- 
mailto:jeberger at free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeberger at jabber.fr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20090601/bf7049df/attachment.pgp>