Coming Attractions

[Paul D. Anderson]

BCS Wrote:

> Reply to Paul,
> 
> > Of course there's no reason why such a "snapshot" specification has to
> > wait until the design is final. It can be based on any current
> > snapshot and updated as changes occur. Again -- 100% backwards, but
> > better, IMHO, than not done at all.
> > 
> 
> This makes me think of how to maintain it. What would be cool is if each 
> spec item had an attached blob of code that checks and demonstrates the assertion 
> made by the item. Then by switching to the latest and greatest and just re-compiling 
> all the blobs you could get a list of items that need to be rewritten. What 
> would be very cool would be all of that in a wiki format that automatically 
> marks out of date sections.
> 
> 

Good idea. Now if we can get someone to bell the cat....