What's the current state of D?
braddr at puremagic.com
Sun May 10 10:12:23 PDT 2009
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> How many people is using that? How bad would it be to call the next
> version of DMD that include the Tango/Druntime runtime D 1.100 or
> something (is really hard to pick right version numbers under the version
> scheme you use[*]) to make clear there is compatibility break in that
> [*] I really wonder how would you call D2 when it's stable. You will just
> say D 2.134 is D2 final/stable? I think this is another problem with
> D, version naming is really confusing and lame. You can't know
> anything from a D version number. And DMD compiler and D specs are too
> much coupled. It would be nice to have separate version numbers if you
> really want to encourage some kind of D standard and compiler vendors
> to start making D compilers.
For what it's worth, there's at least one other major product that follows a
similar versioning scheme.. mysql.
More information about the Digitalmars-d