What's the current state of D?
jarrett.billingsley at gmail.com
Sat May 16 23:33:29 PDT 2009
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Daniel Keep
<daniel.keep.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think this is sufficient. What we really need is to treat each
> part of the version as a complex number.
> In this way, non-stable releases can have imaginary components to
> distinguish them from release versions.
> So the current series of D 2.x compilers would become D 2i.x. Release
> candidates would be D 2i.xi. And of course, a stable release which has
> unreleased modifications could be D 1.x+yi
Why restrict yourself to a two-dimensional complex plane when we have
quaternions and octonions?
More information about the Digitalmars-d