"with" should be deprecated with extreme prejudice
none at anon.com
Sun May 17 20:16:44 PDT 2009
> BCS wrote:
>> Hello Andrei,
>>> dsimcha wrote:
>>>> Absolutely not. It's far too useful as syntactic sugar when
>>>> working heavily with plain old data structs, and saves a lot of
>>>> tedious repetition of the struct instance name.
>>> Make it a member function! If you don't have access to the struct,
>>> use "s." as the prefix! I can't believe that's stopping you from
>>> getting work done!
>> I don't follow.
> "s." is hardly any typing.
wrong bit, I should have cut more:
> Make it a member function!
More information about the Digitalmars-d