"with" still sucks + removing features + adding features
bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Mon May 18 15:59:30 PDT 2009
> Agreed. If you tell someone a .. b means a non-inclusive range
> from a to b, then ask them to guess what blarf a .. blarf b means,
> I would be very surprised if many guessed "inclusive range from blarf
> a to blarf b".
Thank you for nicely expressing one of the critics I was trying to express.
(My other problem is that I'd like a more general syntax).
A different simple solution can be:
case a .. b+1:
That requires no new syntax.
More information about the Digitalmars-d