"with" still sucks + removing features + adding features

[Lutger]

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

...
> 
> So we're looking at a number of problems here. One is that we'd need to 
> change the language in several places to accommodate an ill-conceived 
> feature. Another is that I can't seem to get some very simple points 
> across such as the difference between a token and a non-terminal, in 
> spite of having tried repeatedly and in various forms. Another is that I 
> am becoming suffocated with self-righteousness and therefore am losing 
> goodwill in this thread at an exponentially-increasing rate. Finally, it 
> looks like such discussions necessitate more than a full-time job.
> 
> 
> Andrei

You could ask Walter for advice on most of these matters ;)