Should pure nothrow ---> @pure @nothrow ?

dsimcha dsimcha at yahoo.com
Thu Nov 26 20:58:35 PST 2009


== Quote from Don (nospam at nospam.com)'s article
> It seems that pure and nothrow are attributes, just like @safe.
> (By contrast, you can overload functions based on const and immutable).
> Should the names be changed?

Vote++.  Now that we have attributes, I think this is a no brainer from a
consistency perspective.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list