64-bit

BCS none at anon.com
Sat Oct 17 13:15:14 PDT 2009


Hello Nick,

> "Just Visiting" <nospam at aol.com> wrote in message
> news:hbcbvs$1ees$1 at digitalmars.com...
> 
>> Last things I remember:
>> 
>> - DmD is strictly 32-bit
>> - Someone ported a chronically outdated D-compiler variant to Linux
>> x86_64
>> The ideas behind DmD looked promising to me. But most of my programs
>> showed at least a 2-fold performance increase once they were
>> re-written for 64-bit.
>> 
> Only on 64-bit systems. Which are already ridiculously fast anyway. So
> what if they get some more performance? They already have gobs of
> performance to spare. On a 32-bit system it changes the programs
> performance down to "It don't f** work at all", which is the mark of
> an incredibly arrogant developer who likes to shoot themself in the
> foot by arbitrarily shrinking their own potential user base.

best option, build the language (and the apps) so that they compile on either 
and ship both.





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list