Targeting C

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Pelle Månsson wrote:
> bearophile wrote:
>> Yigal Chripun:
>>
>>> Hell no. This is why I hate certain programming languages.
>>> if you are trying to obfuscate the language than why not just define:
>>> rtqfrdsg and fdkjtkf as the function names?
>>
>> Don't be silly. In my dlibs "xsomething" are the lazy functions, and 
>> "something" are the strict ones. That's not obfuscated, you need 
>> seconds to learn a single easy rule.
>>
>> Bye,
>> bearophile
> I think the complaint was not as much about the x as the iota. 
> Seriously, iota?
> 
> However, I like the array(range(0,10)) where range is always lazy, and 
> array forces eagerness, better than separate xrange and range functions.

Orthogonality for the win.

Andrei