TDPL a bad idea?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "retard" <re at tard.com.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:hk9vgn$f4r$3 at digitalmars.com...
>> Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:20:19 -0500, Bane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Except that you could argue that the government is censoring it for the
>>>> people, thereby making it an outside force imposing control on the
>>>> inside. Merriam-Webster's online definition would tend to go with the
>>>> whole "outside force" idea:
>>>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censor . Generally speaking,
>>>> censorship refers to one group cutting out or blocking material from
>>>> coming into contact with another group, but you might be able to argue
>>>> that it doesn't _have_ to be an outside force. Still, in any kind of
>>>> normal use, it would be.
>>>>
>>>> - Jonathan M Davis
>>> Legal/moral mumbo jumbo. There are group with resources to provide/deny
>>> something to other groups, and there are those without that power.
>>> Reason for first to do it at first place? Same why dog licks his ass -
>>> because he can.
>>>
>>> So if admin of his mailing list can exercise his power to make it more
>>> useful to majority of readers on expense of few (troublesome)
>>> individuals, the better. Its not like anyone is going to gulag if placed
>>> on ban list, for fucks sake.
>> At least in this newsgroup it's easy to get into peoples' killfile. Just
>> disagree with your beloved deitys, Andrei and W.
> 
> Meh, I've outright argued with both of them plenty of times.

I confirm Nick is not in my killfile :o).

Andrei