Tango & Phobos
branimir.milosavljevic at gmail.com
Sun May 2 07:21:06 PDT 2010
Gurney Halleck Wrote:
> == Quote from Bane (branimir.milosavljevic at gmail.com)'s article
> > Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> > > "Nick Sabalausky" <a at a.a> wrote in message
> > > news:hrgbo5$fvo$1 at digitalmars.com...
> > > > "Walter Bright" <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:hrgag4$cp2$2 at digitalmars.com...
> > > >> Jason House wrote:
> > > >>> It is my understanding that several Tango developers no longer follow
> > > >>> digitalmars.D. I recommend posting to the Tango forums.
> > > >>
> > > >> If anyone would like to repost my message initiating this thread in the
> > > >> Tango forums, feel free.
> > > >
> > > > Done: http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/forums/topic/878
> > > >
> > >
> > > It seems to have been silently deleted...(???)
> > >
> > >
> > Yup, that's what Stalin would do :)
> > Joke aside, hot tempered discussion can't bring any good, so its better that way.
> Srsly?!? Its better to censor Walters informative post because the Tango Komintern
> has no good retort?
> The dimwits tried to rewrite history once. They edited the title of Dons bug
> report. They failed to explain that too. This time the truth is out there. Tango
> leadership deserves no respect.
I meant on topic removal from DM newsgroup. I guess Walther did it, as he is the one administering it, right? I support his decision for a reason I wrote above.
As far of Tango leadership and respecting them, time will tell soon. If Walther, Andrei and the rest of people that are making tremendously hard work on D can put their ego aside (quest for fame), then what is to say about people that (face it) do less with Tango and act like their work is more important?
Bottom line is that D should not suffer because of ego of individuals.
More information about the Digitalmars-d