If you have to learn just one programming language
re at tard.com.invalid
Mon May 31 11:17:19 PDT 2010
Mon, 31 May 2010 18:23:18 +0200, Pelle wrote:
> On 05/31/2010 05:43 PM, retard wrote:
>> DMD is much slower than Sun Javac/Jvm 7, GNU GCC 4.5, and LLVM.
> For very special values of much, I suppose.
Polymorphic method calls, auto-vectorization, link-time optimization,
floating point performance, etc.
>> For example the lambda syntax is terribly verbose in D compared to
>> Scala or Haskell.
> But way better than in java, C, C++ or almost any other language.
So basically if I'm offering you $100000 and $10, you're taking $10
because it's more than $1 or $2 or any value between $3 and $4. Great
>> D& DMD are unstable, badly specified, buggy and most dsource projects
>> are deprecated (D1) or dead.
> True, but it's not like D isn't moving anywhere in that aspect.
Not sure about that. I'm still waiting for proper .stringof documentation
and a formal spec for SafeD (I really want to know what it is exactly and
what it is not)..
> Is there a point in here somewhere? :)
I suppose not..
More information about the Digitalmars-d