datetime review part 2 [Update 4]

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 16:23:56 Yao G. wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:11:59 -0600, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com>
> 
> wrote:
> > I think that the real question here is how good the API is.
> 
> I think that the sheer size of the library, specially with a datetime.d
> file with almost 31,600 lines of code (granted, most of them are unit test
> and documentation), makes a little difficult to analyze or give a proper
> review of the code. It will takes a fair share time to do it. Maybe that's
> why very few people has given criticism or suggestions. I only gave a
> cursory view (you need to scroll a lot just to find the implementation
> code), but I'll give it a more throughly review tonight.

That's quite understandable, but that's part of the reason that the ddoc html 
files are there. You don't actually have to go trolling through the code to look 
at the API.

- Jonathan M Davis