std.parallelism: VOTE IN THIS THREAD

dsimcha dsimcha at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 19 07:16:13 PDT 2011


== Quote from Michel Fortin (michel.fortin at michelf.com)'s article
> I say yes.
> I want to mention that I am a left a little skeptical about the lack of
> low-level race safety in this module, but I understand that this is
> more a language- or compiler-level problem than one with the module
> itself. I hope these problem will be addressed eventually and that
> std.parallelism can become safe that day.

I **hope** so, too.  I'm just more skeptical than you that it can be done, even in
principle, without major sacrifices in terms of efficiency, expressiveness or
flexibility.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list