D1 to be discontinued on December 31, 2012

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Wed Dec 14 13:16:53 PST 2011


On 2011-12-14 19:13, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 3:06 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> I'm not suggesting that you would know everything but at least that we
>> could
>> agree what we want to do about TLS and dynamic libraries on Mac OS X.
>>
>> 1. Should we stick with the TLS implementation we have and wait for 10.8
>> 1.A. Does this mean 10.6 will not be supported in the future
>> 1.B. Will we be able to solve the TLS issues with dynamic libraries
>> with the
>> current implementation
>>
>> 2. Should we try to emulate the 10.7 implementation our self to
>> support 10.6 as
>> well and at the same time be forward compatible
>>
>> I would hope that these are question we could try to figure out and
>> agree upon.
>
> The answer is:
>
> I don't know enough about it to pick the right solution.

Fair enough.

> In the future, however, I think it is clear we should not be rolling our
> own solution - we should be compatible with whatever gcc does.

Ok, thanks for clarifying. That would mean either option 2 or wait for 10.8.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list