On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 15:23:10 +0100, deadalnix wrote: > > Some argument are not convincing. OK, log32(n) is close to O(1) in many > cases but it isn't O(1). Matter of fact. > Well, he talks about it, and we must admit that for the memory you *can* address, log32(n) is really, really fast. Matter of fact. :)