boost crowd.

[so]

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:42:24 +0200, Caligo <iteronvexor at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Alexey Veselovsky <
> alexey.veselovsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to switch from C++ to D. But I can't find some things that
>> I love in C++. For example in C++ I can separate module specification
>> and implementation. Advertising article "The Case for D" says that it
>> is real in D too:
>>
>> "D has a true module system that supports separate compilation and
>> generates and uses module summaries (highbrowspeak for "header files")
>> automatically from source, so you don't need to worry about
>> maintaining redundant files separately, unless you really wish to, in
>> which case you can. Yep, that stops that nag right in mid-sentence."
>>
>> But it is not true...
>>
>
> The separation of specification and implementation in C/C++ is not some
> feature that they came up.  I would call it a design defect.  Having to
> split up code between header files and source files is one of the things  
> I
> dislike about C/C++.  As for why anyone would be in love with such a  
> thing,
> well that's just beyond me.

How would you write libraries?